This is our third and final post in this series. We believe outcome statements should be meaningful, measurable, and manageable, and we recommend that organizations evaluate their outcomes against those criteria in that order, because each serves as a more narrow filter than the one before. The universe of meaningful outcomes is big, complex, abstract,[…]
We believe outcome statements should be meaningful, measurable, and manageable. This is our second post in this series, examining the second M. Organizations often struggle to identify outcomes that are both meaningful and measurable. But, because they are required to measure their outcomes, they sacrifice meaningfulness and just count what is easy to count. Sound[…]
Outcome statements should be . . . We believe outcome statements should be meaningful, measurable, and manageable. If an outcome statement cannot meet all three of those criteria, we don’t recommend it. Further, as you brainstorm possible outcomes, they should be evaluated against those criteria, in that order. Oftentimes, organizations arrive at the outcomes they[…]
There’s one thing I love most about the internet – the ability to enter a phrase into a search box that describes a problem that you think is nameless, ill-defined, and without a clear solution and then discover through pages of search results that: (1) it has a name, (2) you aren’t the only one[…]
This is the fourth and final post in a series in which I implore nonprofits to do some critical reflecting and planning before you embark on any evaluation work or make changes to your data collection forms, tools, or processes. I think there are four key things organizations need to know when planning their evaluation[…]
For years, I’ve had an image in my head that represented the results of nonprofits’ often piecemeal, reactive efforts to respond to stakeholder demands and ill-fitting funding opportunities. It can be a patched together, mismatched, less-than-functional mishmash of unclear intentions and unfocused efforts. In my research, I came across a term in home remodeling: subtraction[…]
In my last post, I argued that for continuous quality improvement work in nonprofits to be meaningful and make significant impacts on an organization, it must be: Intrinsically motivated Guided by our own definitions of quality Directed toward goals and driven to change Integrated, not siloed Applied and iterated In this post, I want to[…]
This is my last in a series of four posts that explore the causes and implications of a difficult reality. In the interest of being strategic and making greater impact, many grant funders are becoming increasingly focused, structured, and in some cases, prescriptive, in their funding. This leaves nonprofits to juggle overlapping, divergent, and, in[…]